 |
| grrrrrr. |
at the risk of sounding like an Oprahphile (though i 'spose we should call a spade a spade, huh?), her show and webcast Tuesday
night were awesome. they were all
about anger—what causes it, what you think it's about versus what it's really about, how to really access it
and, finally, how to let it go. and, of course, the relief that comes from
engaging in that process.
it got me thinking about two situations in my life that i
could stand to work on letting go.
the first
i've written here before about a friend who, essentially, broke up with
me. it's been more than a year now and i'm
still not over it. i mean, i'm not upset on a daily basis, and when i really
think about it i can't say my life is lacking without the friendship—because it
wasn't, as it turned out, a true friendship. it was a conditional friendship,
which to me is an oxy moron.
anyway, this person got married last summer, and though we
hadn't talked in months, i sent a note letting her know i was
thinking about her and wished her well and that i hoped we could, at the very
least, stay in touch occasionally. i have a baby now, she has a husband—it's
nice to know what's going on in the lives of people you care about, especially
at this stage when big changes are pretty common.
she didn't respond; i wasn't really surprised, and i was still glad that i wrote to her. anytime
i found myself wondering why things had gone the way they had, or feeling
annoyed that she hadn't even bothered to respond with a quick "thanks, how
are you?" i reminded myself that the friendship was never what i thought
it was, so it wasn't really a loss in the first place.
then, earlier this week, i found out that my mother-in-law
ran into this friend on Sunday in Brooklyn. they met during my wedding (this
friend was one of my bridesmaids) and it was this friend who yelled,
"Maria!" in the restaurant and ran up to my mother-in-law, hugged
her, said she'd seen pictures of Matthew on Michael's Facebook page, told her
husband, "this is Mike's mom!"
when i heard this, i felt a flash of anger. she can act so
chummy with my mother-in-law, as if nothing happened, yet she
can't respond to my e-mail, can't send a simple note congratulating me on
having a baby? i said as much to Michael and he said, "why would she? it's
over."
my immediate response was a huffy, "you're such a guy."
but i later realized that he's right. this friend and i both
said our piece last year, and just because it felt right to me to wish her a
happy wedding over the summer, it doesn't mean she 1) feels the same way; or 2)
owes me anything in return. it's over. our connection served its purpose, our
differences got in the way, and now—time to move on.
the second
the other
situation that bugs me more than it should—and this one is, granted, a little
embarrassing—concerns another blog. there's a girl, four or five years younger
than me, who writes for Parenting.com. she's a single mom and that's her hook.
her pregnancy was unplanned, the father skipped town and she's raising her son
solo. from this she has blogged—for a paycheck—at both Glamour.com and now at
Parenting's website. she also...wrote a book. [deep breath, Megs.]
i first came upon her blog at Glamour and i honestly can't tell you why i've kept reading. she's
not a horrible writer, but her blogs often have obvious grammatical mistakes
and her topic choices sometimes make me want to bang my head on my desk (like a
few weeks ago when she got all pissed off that on Grey's Anatomy, Meredith mentioned wanting to be a stay-at-home-mom
and make jam. "Meredith Grey doesn't know what being a single mother is
really like!" she wrote "there is no jam-making!" pardon my
language here, but: oh come the fuck on.)
she writes repeatedly about how her now four-year-old
child's father chooses not to be in his life and that she does everything alone. it's not an easy job,
god knows, and it sucks that the dad is a deadbeat. but dear god. enough is
enough. i really want to say, "listen, honey. you chose to have a baby in
your twenties. you have a supportive extended family, you have a roof over your
head, you get to write blogs for a living and
you published a freaking book! things
have turned out okay for you. hand the violin to someone else."
right about now you're thinking, "uh, Megs? maybe you
should get a hobby? a life? perhaps stop reading this blog that drives you so batty?" you're exactly right.
the truth is, i'm quite jealous of this person. i get so
worked up when people make money off their "tough" life situations,
especially when they created the situations themselves and especially when they make money writing
about said situations. and if you're lucky enough to get paid to write a blog, can't you at least proofread
before you publish?
(note: i am well aware that my posts are hardly typo-free;
but if i were getting paid to write
here, you can bet your tush my copy would be scrubbed clean.)
i hit rock bottom a couple days days ago, when her entry had
two major errors (she wrote "here's" instead of "hears" and
"LSTATs" instead of "LSATs") and i so badly wanted to
comment and say something smart-ass. that's when i knew i really needed to
stop. i realized that i keep reading this girl's blog just so i can feed my
animosity. somehow, picking on her errors and choice of subject matter make me
feel "better." but not really.
i'm not into envy. it's a waste of time and energy. the precious
minutes i waste thinking, "she can't even spell-check! how does she have a
contract?" would be far better
spent focusing on my own projects. it's all i have control over anyway.
the end
so. two sources of senseless angst crossed off my List of
Things to Worry About. thanks, Oprah. i had to DVR last night's Lifeclass, but look forward to even more
enlightenment very soon.
mbm