a friend of mine from childhood—whom i respect, admire and
love—has taken issue with me for 1) quitting my blog; and 2) railing against
Facebook and other technologies that have, in my opinion, made people socially
lazy (she disagrees).
this friend (i’ll call her George) is, you could say, an
opinionated woman. she posted a bit of a diatribe on this blog’s Facebook wall
yesterday and this morning—in response to an e-mail i sent her last night in response to her diatribe—she
sent me an impassioned message, which i read before i got on the PATH and then
thought about my entire commute. in fact, i had so many thoughts swirling in my
head on the matter that i am un-retiring two days after retiring (Brett Favre,
i feel ya) just to expel them.
countering my argument that people rely on Facebook too
much—to remember birthdays, to remember to say hello to friends, to (ahem) remember
to check for blog updates—she basically said, “so what? how is that different
from me putting a reminder in my phone?” she also said that years ago people
complained about something called e-mail, wondering what happened to
old-fashioned letter-writing or picking up the phone. this—Facebook, etc.—is
just the next step and helps busy people stay in touch.
i thought about this on the train. i happen to be reading a
chapter in Simplicity Parenting currently
about scheduling—or, rather, over-scheduling—and how having too many things to
do (sports, dance classes, art classes, karate lessons, swim lessons, piano
lessons, cooking lessons, language lessons, etc.) is robbing kids of (among
other things) the thrill of anticipation. being so busy is raising their
expectation baseline. there’s no time to be bored, no time to rest, no time to
look forward to the next thing.
and it’s not just kids, obviously. most adults—at least
where i live—have everything going on
and the faster it can all come together, the better. the less time they
actually have to spend involved in something, whether it be ordering or preparing
a meal, communicating with friends and family, watching a show on TV, the better.
if they can do any of those things simultaneously,
jackpot. living this way seems convenient—even necessary—these days. but why?
i suspect many people (perhaps George included) would
answer, “because i have no time! i’m too busy to write a letter or pick up the
phone or watch commercials or leave my BlackBerry at home when i take my kid to
his baseball practice!”
again i ask: but why? must
you be so busy? obviously there are things we all have to do and at certain times in our lives the workload gets even greater. but just as many obligations that feel so important, so integral, could easily be let go in exchange for a little sanity.
i think of it this way: at the end of your life will you be glad you crammed in eight million things? will you have a true recollection of any of those things, or will it all be a blur? will your life be cut short because you developed a stress-related ulcer or had an anxiety-induced heart attack?
i think of it this way: at the end of your life will you be glad you crammed in eight million things? will you have a true recollection of any of those things, or will it all be a blur? will your life be cut short because you developed a stress-related ulcer or had an anxiety-induced heart attack?
seriously. i know you think i’m being dramatic, but think
about it.
why the hell are we all so goddamn busy?
In Simplicity
Parenting, Kim John Payne cites a definition of addiction as put forth by
one of his colleagues: “an increasing and compulsive tendency to avoid pain or
boredom and replace inner development with outer stimulation.”
i floated an idea to Michael the other week. (it seemed like
an epiphany to me at the time, though i’m sure it’s far from it.) i realized that most of
our technological advances (Facebook included) have been instigated by science
whizzes who, i would be willing to bet a large sum of money, are socially awkward
or inept. it makes sense that the people who have the most trouble
communicating and interacting face-to-face with others would be creating ways
to connect that don’t require actually
connecting.
right?
right?
look, George had a point this morning when she said that
without Facebook, she and i would not have reconnected at this stage of our
lives, and i know we both are grateful that we have reconnected. but the most rewarding part of that reconnection has been
the time we’ve spent together, in the same space at the same time—in each
other’s backyards, at various get-togethers, traipsing around our former grade
school while drinking wine….
that is what
matters most in life and that’s what i want to keep alive. i’m not denying the
role Facebook played in getting George and me to the point where we could be in the same space at the same
time, but what worries me is how it seems to be replacing actual, substantive
relationships overall.
when you consider how society has changed over the
years—people used to know their neighbors, people said hello to each other on
the street, co-workers would actually talk to each other in the hall or in the
kitchen rather than relying on e-mails or instant messages—it’s not totally
insane to imagine that someday, maybe perhaps in my son’s lifetime or his
children’s lifetime, human interaction will go the way of the Discman.
these are the things that concern me, that keep me up at
night. am i weird? absolutely. but it’s true all the same. and leaving Facebook
was one little way i could think of to buck the trend. will it accomplish anything significant? not likely. there are a trillion people with active accounts who
don’t worry about the future of humanity. but i felt strongly about quitting the site, so i did.
and i quit my blog in part because i realized my readership
went down after i left Facebook. and that pissed me off, quite frankly. a
friend apparently posted a link to one of my recent posts on her wall the other
day and my page views shot up like you wouldn’t believe. and i thought, see? see?!? if it doesn’t happen on goddamn
Facebook, it doesn’t happen at all.
so, yeah. that’s my very personal, not-for-everyone take on
it. i don’t begrudge other people their social media or even their technology. (hi,
i still own an iPhone.) i’m just more old-fashioned at heart, i guess. i got away
from that for a while, as i said in my last post. i fell victim to the i’m-so-busy-i-must-be-extremely-important
mindset. but having a kid has put things back in perspective. i really, really
want my son to benefit from my presence (both physical and mental) and to grow
up believing that life can be lived one moment at a time (not sixteen moments
at a time).
and i want, at the end of my life, to know that i lived in a way that felt right and meaningful and memorable to me.
mbm


No comments:
Post a Comment